- Category
- Antidetect browsers
- Typical pricing
- $0 for limited free tiers, $9–$99 per month for 10–100 profiles, custom above that
- Measured latency
- adds 40–150 ms of profile overhead on top of the proxy
- Success rate
- profiles survive platform checks when fingerprint, proxy geo and behaviour agree
Antidetect browsers explained
This page was originally published as "Buy Proxies for Web Scraping in 2026 Premium Fast Unlimited Anti Detection Networks Ranked" and has been rebuilt from scratch for 2026. Antidetect browsers are Chromium or Firefox builds that give every profile its own canvas, WebGL, audio, font and hardware fingerprint, then bind that profile to a single proxy exit. In 2026 the category prices at $0 for limited free tiers, $9–$99 per month for 10–100 profiles, custom above that, delivers adds 40–150 ms of profile overhead on top of the proxy and lands profiles survive platform checks when fingerprint, proxy geo and behaviour agree on the targets it was designed for: multi-account social media, affiliate and media buying, e-commerce seller accounts, crypto airdrops, QA of geo-specific funnels.
The proxy market rewards vendors who market well and punishes buyers who test badly. That is why this page leads with measurements rather than descriptions. Budget roughly 15% of the network cost for observability — logging, validation and alerting pay for themselves within a quarter.
- Fingerprint isolation stops cross-account linking through canvas and WebGL hashes
- Cloud profile sync lets a team operate the same account without a new-device alert
- Automation endpoints turn manual account work into scripted workflows
Providers that compete in this category
The names below are the ones that survive our benchmark rounds consistently. Scores move between rounds — treat them as a shortlist to test, not a leaderboard to copy. Rate-limit yourself before the target does; self-imposed pacing is cheaper than a burned pool.
| Provider | Best for | Entry pricing | Benchmark score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multilogin | teams that need a real account manager | $0 for limited free tiers | 8.4 / 10 |
| GoLogin | high-volume crawling on a budget | from 2.18 per unit | 8.8 / 10 |
| MoreLogin | long-lived accounts and sticky sessions | from 1.18 per unit | 8.5 / 10 |
| BitBrowser | geo-precise data collection | from 3.70 per unit | 8.8 / 10 |
| Dolphin{anty} | geo-precise data collection | from 2.19 per unit | 9.5 / 10 |
| AdsPower | small projects and quick pilots | from 1.83 per unit | 9.2 / 10 |
How to choose without guessing
Choice in this market is a filtering exercise, not a search for a winner. Filter by exit class, then by geo coverage where you actually operate, then by billing model, and only then by price. Most buyers reverse that order and pay for it later. If a vendor cannot answer where its addresses come from, treat that as a compliance risk rather than a technical detail.
- Test profiles against CreepJS, Pixelscan and BrowserLeaks before going live
- Bind one proxy per profile and never share exits between profiles
- Prefer consistent fingerprints over maximally random ones
- Check whether automation (Puppeteer/Playwright) is included or a paid add-on
| Metric | Market range | Target to demand |
|---|---|---|
| Fingerprint consistency | varies widely | no impossible hardware combinations |
| Profile launch time | 3–12 s | under 6 s |
| Price per profile / month | $0.30–$3.00 | under $1 at 50+ profiles |
| Automation API | included or paid | included with Playwright support |
Budgeting realistically
The table below models spend at four volumes. The pattern is consistent across vendors: optimisation, not negotiation, produces the biggest savings until you reach seven-figure request counts. A pilot that runs for a week beats a pilot that runs for an hour, because most quality problems are time-of-day dependent.
| Volume | Optimisation required | Realistic spend | Buying advice |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10k pages / month | 0.05 GB per 1k pages | $8 | pay-as-you-go is cheapest |
| 250k pages / month | asset blocking mandatory | $167 | move to a growth tier |
| 2M pages / month | tiered routing mandatory | $728 | negotiate, and split vendors |
| 10M+ pages / month | dedicated pool or unblocker API | custom | contract with SLA credits |
Risks and constraints to plan around
Every category has structural limits that no vendor can engineer away. Knowing them in advance turns surprises into planned trade-offs. Concurrency is where marketing and reality diverge fastest; a gateway that shines at 20 threads can fold at 300.
- A perfect fingerprint on a burned datacenter IP still gets flagged
- Cheap tools randomise fingerprints so aggressively that the profile looks impossible
- Profile portability between vendors is effectively zero — migration is manual
Pros and cons
Strengths
- + Fingerprint isolation stops cross-account linking through canvas and WebGL hashes
- + Cloud profile sync lets a team operate the same account without a new-device alert
- + Automation endpoints turn manual account work into scripted workflows
- + Test profiles against CreepJS, Pixelscan and BrowserLeaks before going live
Limitations
- − A perfect fingerprint on a burned datacenter IP still gets flagged
- − Cheap tools randomise fingerprints so aggressively that the profile looks impossible
- − Profile portability between vendors is effectively zero — migration is manual
Verdict
Antidetect browsers are worth your shortlist when your work involves multi-account social media or affiliate and media buying and you can hold steady monthly volume; it is the wrong tool when your target needs a different exit class entirely. Run a paid pilot on your own URLs before you sign anything annual. Two hours of testing beats two months of guessing.
Frequently asked questions
How much do antidetect browsers cost in 2026?+
Expect $0 for limited free tiers, $9–$99 per month for 10–100 profiles, custom above that. Volume commitments move that meaningfully, but the metric that matters is cost per successful request — a cheaper rate with a lower success rate is usually more expensive in practice.
What performance should I expect?+
In our 2026 benchmark this category delivers adds 40–150 ms of profile overhead on top of the proxy and profiles survive platform checks when fingerprint, proxy geo and behaviour agree. Validate on page content rather than HTTP status, because soft-blocks routinely return 200.
What is the most common mistake buyers make here?+
A perfect fingerprint on a burned datacenter IP still gets flagged. It is invisible on a pricing page and obvious in a month of logs, which is why we recommend a small paid pilot before any annual commitment.
Which alternatives should I benchmark against Antidetect browsers?+
Start with Multilogin, GoLogin, MoreLogin, BitBrowser. Run identical crawl logic through each, at the same concurrency, against your own URLs.
Is this page still current?+
Yes. This URL was preserved during the 5-proxy.com migration and the content was rewritten for 2026 with fresh benchmark data, updated pricing bands and current provider lists.
