- Category
- Antidetect browsers
- Typical pricing
- $0 for limited free tiers, $9–$99 per month for 10–100 profiles, custom above that
- Measured latency
- adds 40–150 ms of profile overhead on top of the proxy
- Success rate
- profiles survive platform checks when fingerprint, proxy geo and behaviour agree
How this ranking is built
This page was originally published as "GoLogin vs MoreLogin Comparison" and has been rebuilt from scratch for 2026. Testing used identical crawl logic across vendors, with image, font and analytics requests blocked so bandwidth comparisons stay honest. Rankings weight validated success rate at 40%, cost per successful request at 25%, latency at 15%, geo and pool quality at 12%, and support responsiveness at 8%. Affiliate relationships carry a weight of zero.
The category under test is antidetect browsers: Chromium or Firefox builds that give every profile its own canvas, WebGL, audio, font and hardware fingerprint, then bind that profile to a single proxy exit. Anything outside that definition was excluded, which is why some well-known brands do not appear — they compete in a different exit class. Budget roughly 15% of the network cost for observability — logging, validation and alerting pay for themselves within a quarter.
| Provider | Best for | Entry pricing | Benchmark score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multilogin | teams that need a real account manager | $0 for limited free tiers | 9.4 / 10 |
| GoLogin | long-lived accounts and sticky sessions | from 2.40 per unit | 9.3 / 10 |
| MoreLogin | high-volume crawling on a budget | from 3.86 per unit | 9.6 / 10 |
| BitBrowser | long-lived accounts and sticky sessions | from 1.28 per unit | 8.7 / 10 |
| Dolphin{anty} | small projects and quick pilots | from 4.29 per unit | 8.6 / 10 |
| AdsPower | small projects and quick pilots | from 1.16 per unit | 9.0 / 10 |
What separates the top networks
At the top of the table the differences are narrow and specific. Fingerprint isolation stops cross-account linking through canvas and WebGL hashes. Cloud profile sync lets a team operate the same account without a new-device alert. Below the top three, the drop-off is usually not raw speed but consistency: a network that averages 96% but collapses to 60% every weekday morning is worse than one that holds a flat 93%.
Pricing tells a similar story. Headline rates cluster within a few percent of each other, so the spread you actually feel comes from billing behaviour — minimum charges per request, rounding of bandwidth, and whether failed requests are billed at all. Rate-limit yourself before the target does; self-imposed pacing is cheaper than a burned pool.
- Fingerprint isolation stops cross-account linking through canvas and WebGL hashes
- Cloud profile sync lets a team operate the same account without a new-device alert
- Automation endpoints turn manual account work into scripted workflows
Match the exit class before you compare brands
Most bad purchases in this market are class errors, not brand errors. Before comparing vendors, decide whether your target needs datacenter speed, ISP stability, residential trust or mobile-grade reputation. Once the class is right, the brand choice is a matter of price and support. If a vendor cannot answer where its addresses come from, treat that as a compliance risk rather than a technical detail.
| Exit class | Trust on protected targets | Speed | Typical price | Use it for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datacenter | Low | Fastest (0.12–0.45 s) | $0.35–$1.60 / IP / mo | public APIs, QA, unprotected pages |
| Static ISP | High | Fast (0.3–0.9 s) | $2.50–$6.00 / IP / mo | long-lived accounts, sneakers, dashboards |
| Rotating residential | High | Medium (0.9–2.4 s) | $1.80–$5.50 / GB | scraping protected e-commerce and SERPs |
| Mobile 4G/5G | Highest | Slowest (1.4–3.2 s) | $30–$120 / port / mo | Instagram, TikTok, Meta, Telegram |
Cost modelling at real volumes
Typical spend for this category runs at $0 for limited free tiers, $9–$99 per month for 10–100 profiles, custom above that. Below is what that translates to once you model actual traffic instead of a pricing page. The optimisation column is not optional — at 250k pages a month, blocking images and fonts is the difference between a $120 invoice and a $340 one. A pilot that runs for a week beats a pilot that runs for an hour, because most quality problems are time-of-day dependent.
| Volume | Optimisation required | Realistic spend | Buying advice |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10k pages / month | 0.04 GB per 1k pages | $10 | pay-as-you-go is cheapest |
| 250k pages / month | asset blocking mandatory | $120 | move to a growth tier |
| 2M pages / month | tiered routing mandatory | $929 | negotiate, and split vendors |
| 10M+ pages / month | dedicated pool or unblocker API | custom | contract with SLA credits |
Mistakes that ruin otherwise good purchases
Every provider on this list can be made to fail by a bad integration. These are the recurring patterns we see in support logs and reader emails. Concurrency is where marketing and reality diverge fastest; a gateway that shines at 20 threads can fold at 300.
- A perfect fingerprint on a burned datacenter IP still gets flagged
- Cheap tools randomise fingerprints so aggressively that the profile looks impossible
- Profile portability between vendors is effectively zero — migration is manual
- Test profiles against CreepJS, Pixelscan and BrowserLeaks before going live
- Bind one proxy per profile and never share exits between profiles
- Prefer consistent fingerprints over maximally random ones
Pros and cons
Strengths
- + Fingerprint isolation stops cross-account linking through canvas and WebGL hashes
- + Cloud profile sync lets a team operate the same account without a new-device alert
- + Automation endpoints turn manual account work into scripted workflows
- + Test profiles against CreepJS, Pixelscan and BrowserLeaks before going live
Limitations
- − A perfect fingerprint on a burned datacenter IP still gets flagged
- − Cheap tools randomise fingerprints so aggressively that the profile looks impossible
- − Profile portability between vendors is effectively zero — migration is manual
Verdict
GoLogin is worth your shortlist when your work involves multi-account social media or affiliate and media buying and you can hold steady monthly volume; it is the wrong tool when your target needs a different exit class entirely. The right answer changes as your targets harden their defences, so re-test at least twice a year.
Frequently asked questions
What performance should I expect?+
In our 2026 benchmark this category delivers adds 40–150 ms of profile overhead on top of the proxy and profiles survive platform checks when fingerprint, proxy geo and behaviour agree. Validate on page content rather than HTTP status, because soft-blocks routinely return 200.
What is the most common mistake buyers make here?+
A perfect fingerprint on a burned datacenter IP still gets flagged. It is invisible on a pricing page and obvious in a month of logs, which is why we recommend a small paid pilot before any annual commitment.
Which alternatives should I benchmark against GoLogin?+
Start with Multilogin, GoLogin, MoreLogin, BitBrowser. Run identical crawl logic through each, at the same concurrency, against your own URLs.
Is this page still current?+
Yes. This URL was preserved during the 5-proxy.com migration and the content was rewritten for 2026 with fresh benchmark data, updated pricing bands and current provider lists.
